Let's just focus on getting a solution for this:

https://electrosports.myfootballnow.com/watch/466#78674

''6-Will Smith pass complete to 11-Taylor Swift to ENT 2 for 11 yards. Tackle by 36-Dennis Thurman. Great move by 11-Taylor Swift to get free of his coverage.''

:)

Nice projection bucko, don’t forget to unwad your panties

Daballa being real koi rn no cap

Directly related to my professional life, but not so much here.
Some of you know I have been and continue to be involved in online gaming as an owner/developer since 2002 with Sanctum CCG.

There has been much discussion regarding the user experience in relation to actual human relations - including and never excluding any and all possible relations and gender identities.

In fact, I recently included this thread into a gender relationships think tank discussion with my peer/mentor group. These are folks who create games, run gaming companies, created dropbox, started virtual commodities, teach masters level human relations and psychology, work for various world governments in military/government data security, etc et al. A pantheon of experience that I've been allowed to journey, learn, and grow with that far exceeds my actual abilities.

Moving forward:
The demand from the gaming community for any level of relationship based content enhancement to their and within prospective gaming environs, ranges from the simple - see the inclusion of female athletes in a sports game above - to in depth simulated human relationships (with the "s/he's just not into you" being pushed into obsoletion due to the profits to be had among consumers ages 18-25).
What a big, right hand you have. ;) Well, left these days. Mouses LMAO.

Unsurprisingly, a non-winnable relationship is the last option in relation to user satisfaction (Yea I see the puns).
Not surprisingly, users overwhelmingly prefer a winnable conquest - be it a football field, a false world, or a real life relationship.
Thus, the resistance to an inclusive gaming environment - in a really dumbed down nutshell.

I won't bother with the political influences and how impossible US politics have made feild gender coding -even for *** specific games (all of which are conquest related) - impossible for even the very best of "virtual relationship engineers."

The inclusion of a simple M/F identifier - especially within the constructs of MFN - are easily achieved.
I pointed to this in 2020 regarding the lack of AI generated player names with a female orientation.

The OG poster just took the idea of inclusion a step further into imaginary box scores and play recitals.
Frankly, from a coding perspective, inclusion is enough, inserting pronouns into AI generated statements is actually a real *****, with no "winnable" situation.
Pardon the expression ;)

There are a lot of persons with invaluable experience walking away from the field because of the landmines involved.
Can't beat - or in this case - outcode *** based predujices. Especially when what is desired is often the opposite of what is community displayed.

Including Female names into the player generated name pool is easy peasy, coding the statement reminders for box or play displays in the background is quite complex and I would classify as very low priority.
Thus they/them.
It’s just pronouns used properly, put your manskin back on for those who triggered.
It’s just proper grammar, FFS.

Regardless, User data shows absolute inclusion over cis based and/or male dominated based identities is optimal for profit.

The bottom line wins.
Scoreboard.
Gender equity is soooo 2022. Catch Up.

Isee you defending your improper alpha male ness and raise you the data above that is directly contrary to your fears of whatever you think including non-males would do to you.
S
Seriously , daballa, you recognize the fear you are showing regarding the fraility of your so called cis-manliness?

We do.
Anyway, just another cis man who knows inclusion matters, and I'm not afraid to show it.
Unlike folks against such simple ideas of including women.
Oh wait, we just had an election regarding the inclusion of women.

I get it. You are one of those selfish folks who punish others becuase they do not fit into your little "squared" ideologies.

I forgive your biases, and ask you look at them with a purpose of growth instead of the purpose of self righteousness.

People fighting for the continued privilage of excluding everyone else is not going to work moving forward, it is unfortunate you have choosen this hill to post your sexist flags upon.

Good day to you , daballa and bruno - recognize its 2 of you and many of us.

From one cis man to another -
Having female names is not the end of the world what is wrong with you!!??

I think ColonelFailure was making a minor joke about their own league (which is something I'm willing to bet they are proud of the fact that people in their league want to have female/nonbinary players included in the game, if I'm wrong then oops). That's really not the kind of joke worth over-worrying about in regards to intersectional feminism.

I'm pro-female + non-binary players in the game + would consider myself feminist, hence why I liked the original post. I'm just taking the **** out of your joke policing of something really harmless because it's funny (and something I think was a joke highlighting the positive aspects of their own league).

See, I went data, personal experience.
You went directly to namecalling.

You and those like you daballa, and your absolute weakness which results in demands for subjugation, is and are the only problem with the suggestion of inclusion.

Truth is, real men don't have to fake it, nor do they have to prompt it all peacock style as you are.

Grow up and get over it, or continue to go about your sexism.
Your call, brother of Cain.

hey, I like baiting sexists.
I just can't help it in 2022.
:)

I'm not against gendering players, all I said was that you need to lighten up. So in light of your recent posts where you type out novels that say nothing while using big words to make yourself sound smart, lighten up.

And Bruno's right, you completely missed the point of the first post you replied to