WarEagle wrote:
Ok. That will open up a lot more options not having to use a FB.
I assume I can also use WR as TE since those positions are also closely related?
Advantage of playing WR's at TE nets bigger dividends for the TE-focused plays that has a WR subbed in.
Advantage of playing RB's at FB probably nets not much of a difference at all for FB-focused plays.
*BG, I don't think you've done anything that even comes CLOSE to exploitation and personally, I don't think you really need to justify anything.
For the rest of us. I had a leader, way back in the day that had the right saying for this whole dealio,
"Let your conscience be your guide." - If you get outta line, someone here is going to let you know.